Krauthammer: Insight into our White House
If you want to understand the silliness of the White House attacking Fox read Mr. Krauthammer's "White House Tactics Go Too Far".
A sample:
"Fox News is no monopoly. It is a singular minority in a sea of liberal media. ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, CNN, MSNBC vs. Fox. The lineup is so unbalanced as to be comical -- and that doesn't even include the other commanding heights of the culture that are firmly, flagrantly liberal: Hollywood, the foundations, the universities, the elite newspapers."
If you do not see this, your perception of available news is being seen through ideological glasses!
He also points out that using a Mao idolater like Anita Dunn, whose ignorance was shown in the clip of her 2005 speech to high school students, does not help their credibility! I liked his clear expanation of the stupidity of her speech:
"Defend Fox from the likes of Anita Dunn? She's been attacked for extolling Mao's political philosophy in a speech at a high school graduation. But the critics miss the surpassing stupidity of her larger point: She was invoking Mao as support and authority for her impassioned plea for individuality and trusting one's own choices. Mao as champion of individuality? Mao, the greatest imposer of mass uniformity in modern history, creator of a slave society of a near-billion worker bees wearing Mao suits and waving the Little Red Book?"
Now that is pretty easy to understand!
A sample:
"Fox News is no monopoly. It is a singular minority in a sea of liberal media. ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, CNN, MSNBC vs. Fox. The lineup is so unbalanced as to be comical -- and that doesn't even include the other commanding heights of the culture that are firmly, flagrantly liberal: Hollywood, the foundations, the universities, the elite newspapers."
If you do not see this, your perception of available news is being seen through ideological glasses!
He also points out that using a Mao idolater like Anita Dunn, whose ignorance was shown in the clip of her 2005 speech to high school students, does not help their credibility! I liked his clear expanation of the stupidity of her speech:
"Defend Fox from the likes of Anita Dunn? She's been attacked for extolling Mao's political philosophy in a speech at a high school graduation. But the critics miss the surpassing stupidity of her larger point: She was invoking Mao as support and authority for her impassioned plea for individuality and trusting one's own choices. Mao as champion of individuality? Mao, the greatest imposer of mass uniformity in modern history, creator of a slave society of a near-billion worker bees wearing Mao suits and waving the Little Red Book?"
Now that is pretty easy to understand!
posted by Jim | 8:29 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home