"Team ObamaCare: Sanger, Ginsburg and Holdren"
If this column by Mark Alexander doesn't cause you to recognize Healthfare or what it is and work against it, I am not sure what would! This post is a follow up to my post of yesterday on John Holdren and ties in other aspects of Obama's administration and the left's desires for our country.
Yesterday, BHO made comments on his Healthfare and the need for the viable alternative of hospices in our society. His "public option" has a board appointed by him who will make the medical decisions for all of us, based on cost. These two things together had better wake up the elderly. The only way to read them is that since most medical costs occur in the last year of life, the hospices will see a lot of activity under his plan!
I don't know about you, but I want to make this choice myself! An example of points in the column:
"Considering the prospect of Socialists in charge of dispensing health care from cradle to grave, I was reminded, by none other than Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that when one is in need of health care, one should not depend on folks who advocate a "culture of death."
In an interview last week, Ginsburg said that she thought "at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
This comment was not some senile blunder from an aging jurist noted for nodding off during High Court deliberations.
In fact, Ginsburg's candid assessment of the Left's advocacy for abortion as a means for controlling propagation of undesirable ethnic groups is based upon the writings of atheist social activist and leftist icon Margaret Sanger.
Some 50 years before Roe v. Wade, Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became Planned Parenthood, now the largest perpetrator of abortions in the U.S."
Yesterday, BHO made comments on his Healthfare and the need for the viable alternative of hospices in our society. His "public option" has a board appointed by him who will make the medical decisions for all of us, based on cost. These two things together had better wake up the elderly. The only way to read them is that since most medical costs occur in the last year of life, the hospices will see a lot of activity under his plan!
I don't know about you, but I want to make this choice myself! An example of points in the column:
"Considering the prospect of Socialists in charge of dispensing health care from cradle to grave, I was reminded, by none other than Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that when one is in need of health care, one should not depend on folks who advocate a "culture of death."
In an interview last week, Ginsburg said that she thought "at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
This comment was not some senile blunder from an aging jurist noted for nodding off during High Court deliberations.
In fact, Ginsburg's candid assessment of the Left's advocacy for abortion as a means for controlling propagation of undesirable ethnic groups is based upon the writings of atheist social activist and leftist icon Margaret Sanger.
Some 50 years before Roe v. Wade, Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became Planned Parenthood, now the largest perpetrator of abortions in the U.S."
Labels: Healthcare
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home