Sotomayor Watch #10
We've all wondered if the words from Sonia Sotomayor during the Senate hearings for her elevation to SCOTUS were truthful - since they so often contradicted by her previous actions as a judge. I think we have the beginning of answers.
Redstate reports on her written answers to the Senate committee. Seems to be a little inconsistency. I interpret her verbal answers Clintonesque - "It depends on what the meaning of "is" is" - one thing for the cameras and another in performance of her duties.
It is truly unfortunate that the Dems cannot present their case honestly and ask for support, but have to lie to achieve their ends. Does that disgust anyone else?
Redstate reports on her written answers to the Senate committee. Seems to be a little inconsistency. I interpret her verbal answers Clintonesque - "It depends on what the meaning of "is" is" - one thing for the cameras and another in performance of her duties.
It is truly unfortunate that the Dems cannot present their case honestly and ask for support, but have to lie to achieve their ends. Does that disgust anyone else?
Labels: Politics
posted by Jim | 9:15 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home