Good for the NYT!
The NYT publishes a column in "Tierney Lab" on "a withering critique" of the "federal report on climate change" (read about it here in the NYT of June 16, 2009).
"...Dr. Pielke, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, asks:
[Why] is a report characterized by [White House] Science Advisor John Holdren as being the “most up-to-date, authoritative, and comprehensive” analysis relying on a secondary, non-peer source citing another non-peer reviewed source from 2000 to support a claim that a large amount of uncited and more recent peer-reviewed literature says the opposite about?"
You can read the column here.
At least it is some exposure for the other side of the story. I am actually surprised!
"...Dr. Pielke, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, asks:
[Why] is a report characterized by [White House] Science Advisor John Holdren as being the “most up-to-date, authoritative, and comprehensive” analysis relying on a secondary, non-peer source citing another non-peer reviewed source from 2000 to support a claim that a large amount of uncited and more recent peer-reviewed literature says the opposite about?"
You can read the column here.
At least it is some exposure for the other side of the story. I am actually surprised!
Labels: Global Warning
posted by Jim | 1:59 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home