SCOTUS Ignorance - REDUX
I was glad to see this morning that I am not the only person disturbed by what I consider the ignorance of Justice Ginsburg (see post below). Christine Flowers, a lawyer writing a column for the Philadelphia Daily News, does a much better job of explaining the problem.
Key 'graphs:
"And they've criticized those who think U.S. courts should stick to U.S. laws and our U.S. Constitution (which Madame Justice Ginsburg swore to uphold and defend as part of her oath of office) as jingoistic and narrow-minded. Listen, they say, it's a big world out there, and I guess we can learn a lot from our brothers and sisters in, say, Canada, where they sneer at the First Amendment, or in Saudi Arabia, which sanctions marriage between 8-year-old girls and middle-aged men.
Ginsburg apparently doesn't believe in the supremacy of the Constitution because to do so would apparently be arrogant. She implied that the failure to consider the reasoning of foreign judges diminished the importance of the Supreme Court, although she didn't give details other than to say that the Canadian high court is "cited more widely abroad than the U.S. Supreme Court," and she made the telling observation that "you will not be listened to if you don't listen to others."
Ah, so that's it. We have to play nice in the international legal sandbox so that other people will pay us some respect. Ginsburg and her legal eagles apparently believe that the law is like a popularity contest and the system with the most friends wins.
It's frightening that a sitting justice would actually say that we should be worried about how other countries feel about our administration of justice.
They had no hand in crafting our Constitution. They are neither bound by our laws, nor have they sent men and women to die in defense of our laws." (my emphasis)
You can and should read the whole column here.
If SCOTUS can't believe in our sovereignity, we have real problems!
Key 'graphs:
"And they've criticized those who think U.S. courts should stick to U.S. laws and our U.S. Constitution (which Madame Justice Ginsburg swore to uphold and defend as part of her oath of office) as jingoistic and narrow-minded. Listen, they say, it's a big world out there, and I guess we can learn a lot from our brothers and sisters in, say, Canada, where they sneer at the First Amendment, or in Saudi Arabia, which sanctions marriage between 8-year-old girls and middle-aged men.
Ginsburg apparently doesn't believe in the supremacy of the Constitution because to do so would apparently be arrogant. She implied that the failure to consider the reasoning of foreign judges diminished the importance of the Supreme Court, although she didn't give details other than to say that the Canadian high court is "cited more widely abroad than the U.S. Supreme Court," and she made the telling observation that "you will not be listened to if you don't listen to others."
Ah, so that's it. We have to play nice in the international legal sandbox so that other people will pay us some respect. Ginsburg and her legal eagles apparently believe that the law is like a popularity contest and the system with the most friends wins.
It's frightening that a sitting justice would actually say that we should be worried about how other countries feel about our administration of justice.
They had no hand in crafting our Constitution. They are neither bound by our laws, nor have they sent men and women to die in defense of our laws." (my emphasis)
You can and should read the whole column here.
If SCOTUS can't believe in our sovereignity, we have real problems!
Labels: Society
posted by Jim | 8:33 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home